Is minimally invasive surgery a good choice for you?
The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), which includes laparoscopic and robotic procedures, in colorectal surgery has been increasing in recent years. Multiple studies have shown that MIS procedures are as safe as open surgeries, when appropriate.
As with any surgery, MIS should be performed only by surgeons who have completed appropriate training and are an expert in the procedure—and after an informed discussion between the surgeon and the patient.
Beyond safety, there are numerous advantages of minimally invasive surgery over open surgery. The small incisions used in MIS lead to less bleeding and less discomfort and pain, and hence less need for pain medication. Reports also indicated fewer infections and wound complications and overall better healing than in open surgery.
In addition, bowel functions are restored quicker following MIS than following open surgery, which results in overall faster recovery, shorter hospitalization, and a quicker return to the patient’s daily routine.
Importantly, reports also indicate that in-hospital mortality is significantly lower in patients treated with MIS than patients who had open surgery.
The long-term outcomes from minimally invasive surgery are at least equivalent to open surgery, and outcomes continue to be evaluated in multiple studies across the world. For elderly patients over 65, the use of MIS has led to improved survival rates. Additional information about survival rates in the elderly is provided by the National Institutes of Health, available here and here.
Top resources
Krazati approved for previously treated KRASG12C colorectal cancer
The treatment option is for patients with KRASG12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who have received prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy.
Christy Williams: Biomarker testing leads to successful treatment
Statistics suggested that Christy’s odds of survival were grim, so she leaned into her faith and kept a positive outlook. She tried to control what she could. And, critically, she received biomarker testing.
EPIC Act to Advance New CRC Therapies Needs Support
The EPIC Act would encourage investment in clinical trials for additional uses of existing drugs.